← task board · runs · Qwen 3.6 35B A3B · pi + subagents
Status: ERR (VerifierTimeoutError after 900s) in
fast__qwen3.6-35b-a3b__20260707-001626 (subagents harness). Not an agent
timeout and not an infra flake: the agent finished normally after ~8 min, the
verifier started, passed tests 1–2, then hung ~9 minutes inside
test_compare_golden_vs_solution_runtime until Harbor killed the exec at the
task's 900s verifier cap. VerifierTimeoutError is on the retry exclude
list, so it stays an ERR on the board.
True verdict is FAIL, not a near-miss. The solution is semantically
correct (tests 1–2 passed; the agent's own diff showed 0 differences) but
measured ~140x slower than golden — even with an unlimited verifier budget the
<= 1.05 * golden_median assertion fails by two orders of magnitude.
Contrast: the plain-pi baseline on this model failed the same test at
1.36x golden (see the pi harness analysis for this task) — a near-miss.
This run regressed to a categorically worse query. The 27b subagents run
(fast__qwen3.6-27b__20260706-231402) PASSED this task at 0.99x golden.
Measured on the host against the task DB with the verifier's PRAGMAs
(sqlite 3.53): golden 0.30s, this run's sol.sql 42.4s per execution.
Scaled by the in-container golden time from passing runs (0.67s ≈ 2.2x host),
sol ≈ 95s+ per run in the 1-CPU/2GB container. The runtime test executes
each query 6 times (warm-up + 5 alternating iterations) ≈ 570s+, but tests
1–2 (including one ~2 min run of the slow original in test 1, plus apt/uv
setup) had already burned ~360s of the 900s budget. The timeline confirms it:
verifier exec 00:26:36 → last stdout (..) 00:32:32 → killed 00:41:36.
Consistent with the transcript: the agent's two verification commands (each running original + sol once) took 216s each — original ≈ 120s + sol ≈ 95s.
Generalizable: any slow-but-correct solution to this task with per-run cost over roughly 90s converts a scored FAIL into an unscored ERR, because the benchmark loop no longer fits the fixed 900s verifier budget.
Every CTE in the agent's query is individually fast (base 0.07s, word_stats 0.21s, synset_counts 0.29s on host). The blowup is entirely in the final SELECT, isolated by bisection:
word_stats JOIN top_synset: 0.26swords JOIN word_stats: 0.17swords JOIN word_stats JOIN top_synset: 42sThe plan for the 3-way join shows why:
SCAN ws -- 17,834 rows
SEARCH synset_counts USING AUTOMATIC PARTIAL COVERING INDEX (rn=?)
SEARCH words USING AUTOMATIC COVERING INDEX (wordid=?)
The DB ships with zero indexes, so SQLite builds automatic transient
indexes per query. For the top_synset lookup it chose an index on rn
alone — but rn = 1 matches all 17,834 top rows, so each of the 17,834
word_stats rows scans all of them and filters by wordid afterwards:
~318M row visits, quadratic in the eligible-word count. The golden query
never creates this shape — its final SELECT joins only two materialized
CTEs pairwise (word_stats ⋈ synset_sense_counts with the rn = 1 filter
inline), and the automatic index lands on wordid.
Notably the agent's redundant fourth join (synset_counts sc joined again on
rn = 1 beside top_synset) is NOT the cause — a variant without it still
takes 42s. The killer is purely the planner's rn-only automatic index on the
3-way join.
15 tool calls, competent exploration (schema, counts, EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
on the original), then one write of sol.sql and verification:
diff of original vs solution output was empty. RULE 2 worked.EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
shapes ("no more correlated scalar subqueries") and declared the query
optimized. It never timed sol against anything — not the original, not
/tests/golden.sql — on a task whose single scored axis is runtime.subagent calls at all — pure self-serve. Whatever this
trial measures, it is not the subagent workflow; count it accordingly in
the delegation-rate A/B.Model optimization + verification miss, same failure class as the plain-pi baseline (optimized against the original, never against golden), but with a worse query and a new harness-visible consequence: the slow solution pushed the verifier past its own timeout, so the board shows ERR where the true verdict is FAIL. No harness mechanism misbehaved (no cap fired, write guard and pruner idle).
/app/oewn.sqlite from
alexgshaw/query-optimize:20251031, run the sol.sql from the transcript
(runs/fast__qwen3.6-35b-a3b__20260707-001626/query-optimize__mAEywRE/agent/pi.txt)
with PRAGMA temp_store=MEMORY; PRAGMA cache_size=-100000 on a read-only
connection.In fast__qwen3.6-35b-a3b__20260708-115953 (loop_guard+nudges on,
strip_thinking off) the model finally beat this task — the verifier scored
reward 1.0 — yet the board shows ERR AgentTimeoutError at exactly 30m00s.
The 30 minutes decompose into three phases, two of them pure harness loss:
VERIFICATION PASSED: outputs are identical), one
reviewer child, clean final answer at 12:25:43 (session span 1306s).
Unlike the 07-07 trial, runtime was actually addressed this time — the
verifier's <= 1.05x golden runtime test passed.Scoring note: count this as a PASS when reading the board (reward 1.0 is recorded); the ERR is teardown, not agent failure. Ledger items: subagent child wall-clock cap + post-session hang fix.