First benchmark run of laguna-s-2.1 (poolside 118B-A8B MoE, UD-Q4_K_S,
partial offload, -c 262144) on this box. MinimalPi, K=1, no fast-fail caps.
Run as four one-task jobs (this dir is job 1 of 4) with an llama-swap
restart before each, the documented mitigation for the partial-offload RAM
ratchet — the box started at only 10.4 GiB MemAvailable. See the batch summary
in the sibling smoke__laguna-s-2.1__20260726-201248/NOTES.md.
Batch result: 3/4 — regex-log, nginx-request-logging, openssl-selfsigned-cert PASS; fix-git FAIL.
Not a harness fault and not flailing: 19 tool calls, no retries, natural stop,
every guard armed and none fired (0 loop-guard blocks, 0 write rejections, 0
bash timeouts). The model drove git competently — reflog → found the dangling
"Move to Stanford" commit 650dba4 → cherry-pick → hit the expected conflict
in _includes/about.md.
The failure is the conflict resolution. Verifier runs two assertions:
test_layout_file — PASSEDtest_about_file — FAILED: hash(/app/personal-site/_includes/about.md)
!= hash(/app/resources/patch_files/about.md)
(0273104059c6… vs 04bd29b908d4…)The model resolved the conflict by hand-writing its own merged version of
about.md with write_file, then declared done after verifying git status and
git log. It never compared the resulting file content against an authoritative
source — and hand-transcription is lossy (its content ends with a trailing space
and no trailing newline).
runs/smoke__qwen3.6-35b-a3b__20260726-100656 (fix-git PASS, 18s agent) shows
the same mistake made twice and then caught:
write_file about.md — hand-typed merge, wrong.git show 650dba4:_includes/about.md | cat -A — inspected exact bytes.write_file again — still wrong, and visibly mangled: StanfordCS,
GoogleResearch (dropped spaces during retyping).git show 650dba4:_includes/about.md > _includes/about.md — restored the
file byte-exactly from the git object instead of retyping it. This is what
made it pass.So the difference is not capability, it is a verification habit: restore content from the authoritative object rather than reproducing it by hand, and check bytes rather than process state. Both models' first instinct was to retype; only the 35b checked.
Note the shape relative to preamble RULE 2 ("verify every requirement with real
commands"): laguna did verify — it ran git status and git log --graph and
both looked perfect. It verified the process while the graded criterion was
content. That is a distinct near-miss shape from the classic
"claimed success, ran nothing" false-success, and RULE 2 as worded does not
catch it. Follow-ups filed in AGENT_TODOS.md.
💬 2 analyst comments inline below (from runs/smoke__laguna-s-2.1__20260726-193806/COMMENTS.md).
llama-local/laguna-s-2.1agentharnesses.minimal_pi:MinimalPithinkingonreasoning budgetdirect (server/none)* — see journal for the authoritative mechanismmaxTokens / contextWindow65536 / 196608agent timeout ×2.0trials1 of 1 — 0 pass · 1 failmean reward0.00tokens (job total)76,479 in / 3,363 outstarted / finished2026-07-26T19:38 / 2026-07-26T19:42wall clock4m18sGenuine task-logic near-miss, not a harness failure — every guard was armed and none fired (0 loop blocks, 0 write rejections, 0 bash timeouts), 19 tool calls, natural stop. 1 of 2 verifier assertions passed.
| # | result | total | agent | in/out tok | flags | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FAIL | 4m18s | 3m44s | 76479/3363 | 🔍 view | |
Resolved the Compare the 35b on the same task ( Worth noting for the false-success taxonomy: this is not the usual "claimed success without running anything" shape. laguna verified real state with real commands — just the process (git graph) rather than the content the verifier grades. Preamble RULE 2 as currently worded is satisfied by what it did. | ||||||